Managing Risks

The Colorado Appellate Rules and the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure underwent some changes effective January 1, 2018. Here’s a summary of the rule changes.

Jack Metzler’s forthcoming article about using the (cleaned up) parenthetical for altered quotations makes a good case for streamlining the Bluebook rules on quotations in legal writing.

Learn how to perform a review or audit of your organization’s internal processes for important policies for practical and legal compliance.

Learn more about the Colorado Court of Appeals’ new opinion on statutory settlement offers, particularly whether costs are included and how costs are handled pre- and post-offer.

A recent Tenth Circuit case provides some good appellate practice pointers for federal court, particularly around procedural quirks in giving the court jurisdiction over your appeal.

Is your church prepared with a security plan? Check out this post by security expert, former Ranger sniper, and ordained pastor Scott Brawner.

Several recent developments call into question the acceptability of certain scientific theories and research on sexual abuse.

The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that the 2015 amendments to C.R.C.P. 26 do not require automatic exclusion of expert testimony when the underlying expert report fails to meet Rule 26 requirements.

In a newly published decision, the Tenth Circuit provides guidance on exclusionary sanctions when a party fails to supplement its initial damages disclosures.

Can a court sua sponte grant summary judgment on a theory not raised by a party? In Oldham v. O.K. Farms, the Tenth Circuit provides guidance on Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f)(2).